Tag Archives: unoriginality watch

more online originality

If more proof was needed that advertisers, even major ones, just don’t get this webbernet thing, I give you yet another YouTube contest that I stumbled upon this morning while looking for a commercial I was going to post about. From P&G, one of the most respected and innovative marketers around comes this gem:

gillette phenom contest

First of all, user-generated contests are dead. They worked when they had novelty, when it was possible to get that fifteen minutes of fame through something like this. They also worked as long as the stakes could be raised, like having the winner’s creation shown during the Super Bowl.

Without either novelty or a breakthrough prize, and considering that everyone else is doing it (including competitor Schick, whose contest Circle One sent up on AdPulp), this tactic is both unoriginal and lazy.

Further, I would be willing to bet, it is completely ineffective. It is ineffective because the internet is a vast sea of content, none of which I have to see if I don’t want to.

By that I mean to draw a clear distinction between the online space and, say, television. Television is still the best way to broadly reach an audience because, while I am watching, I am captive and brands can push their messages out to me. This is not the case online.

Tangerine Toad has a great post on “Clicking Through The Internet” which is, as he describes it, “the name I give to the phenomenon whereby normally intelligent people at both digital and traditional agencies decide that people will find their cool new flash microsite without any sort of external driver. It’s as if the internet were a giant cable TV line-up or magazine and the consumer will be clicking through it, land on the microsite and magically become entranced.”

The content online is, for all intents and purposes, infinite. There is no line-up, no captive audience and only the slimmest chance that someone will stumble upon your site or contest or brand without an external driver.

And even if a person were to stumble upon your online marketing tactic by accident, they are just as likely to blog about what a bad idea it is as they are to react to it.

Memo to Gillette: You need to read Tangerine Toad to get a handle on this new internet age. You also may want to get an agency that doesn’t pitch you re-tread, hacky ideas.

plagiarism or honest similarities?

An astute reader called out the Neuf Music ads as plagiarism.

Intrigued, and because nobody can say that The Daily (Ad) Biz doesn’t follow a lead, I looked into this…and came back with artist Christian Marclay and his 1991 “Body Mix” series:

marclaymix31e57613os2.jpg

There is no doubt that there are significant similarities between his work and the Neuf Music work, but plagiarism? You’d have a better case with the Sony Bravia ads by Fallon UK than with these…at least in that case the production company knew the artist in question.

Even if Agence V knew about Marclay’s work, does that make it plagiarism?

Taking a post-modernist “nothing is original” stance, everything is based on and inspired by and comes from and has been influenced by something. Directly or indirectly. And sometimes different people independently come up with similar ideas.

Plagiarism, this is not. Being most un-generous, one could call the Neuf Music work unoriginal (until more information comes to light…I will keep digging).

A great catch by the reader though. You win an image of a gold EFFIE for effectiveness as an advertising sleuth.

gold_effie_72dpi.jpg

Well done.

ban drops a stinkton (heights) on america

Today is a busy day at the House of Biz, especially since our server crashed and took all of today’s snazzy work for my CPG client with it.

But, playing like the champion I am, I came up for air only to be confronted by Ban deodorant’s Stinkton Heights – with commentary by both Adrants and AdScam.

Though Adrants gives this site leeway because “[personal hygiene ads] walk this terrific moral and social line that’s bound to result in lots of misunderstandings and wince-worthy ads,” it still makes the Daily (Ad) Biz’ bad advertising list.

stinkton-heights.png

And not just because the site failed to re-size to my laptop’s screen size and the load time was excruciating.

Nor because Weiden is able to do great work on Old Spice deodorant (different target, yes, but still a deodorant and you tell me which work you think is stronger):

And not even because Stinkon Heights is awful similar to this Filthington.org idea by Drew Shaman that won a Merit award in the Student One Show awards last year:

02_filthington1.jpg

Mainly I don’t like it because it is too obvious.

The eye-watering color-scheme, the teeny magazine copy, the faux-Blair Witch expose (still can’t do the thing over the “e”) of Stinkton Heights…as if anyone would want to expose something like stinky people.

I certainly don’t think that it deserves the vitriol that George Parker sends its way, but I do think that too often ho-hum ideas get through agencies and clients on the back of being executed via “New Media/New Technology.” An interactive microsite is a tactic, not an idea. Online videos? Quizzes? Advice columns? MySpace? Also tactics, not one of them an idea.

And I don’t think that Stinkton Heights is a good idea.